tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2394674124009701069.post2019748705401947335..comments2023-04-25T23:26:34.676+01:00Comments on The Psychology of Attractiveness Podcast: Smiling and beauty. July 2013Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2394674124009701069.post-32379664235808318762013-11-07T18:06:17.996+00:002013-11-07T18:06:17.996+00:00It's a possibility, but we would probably not ...It's a possibility, but we would probably not expect (nulliparous) women to have an idea in their heads of what their children with their current partner look like. But they might - I don't think anyone has tested that.<br /><br />It is true that attractiveness is relative, and that familiarity is attractive: women may come to prefer their partner's traits more once their relationship has started.Robhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02429451227454982881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2394674124009701069.post-80575848003920356002013-11-07T17:49:19.023+00:002013-11-07T17:49:19.023+00:00Do you think that perhaps the women liked the mixe...Do you think that perhaps the women liked the mixed faces more, not due to their desiring to mate with the person, but because women are somehow programmed to like their face melded with their partner's face because that's what the children would look like? I imagine that what is attractive is relative, in that a woman may consider attractive whatever she is drawn to, and her child's face would attract her in some way.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com